Re-Canthoplasty After Reconstruction

Medial epicanthoplasty had been performed,
but the epicanthal fold at the inner corner remained,
leaving the eyes looking stuffy.

Through medial epicanthoplasty revision,
the remaining epicanthal fold was removed.
The inner corner opened more clearly,
improving the overall impression.

The patient had medial epicanthoplasty at another clinic,
but the inner corner was over-opened.
After reconstruction, the fold covered the inner corner again,
so the patient wanted a clearer eye shape.

Medial epicanthoplasty revision removed the remaining fold
and exposed the lacrimal lake appropriately.
The eye shape became clearer,
and the awkward out-line crease looked more natural.

The inner corner was covered by an epicanthal fold,
hiding the double-eyelid line.
The lacrimal lake was not exposed,
creating a stuffy-looking eye shape.

Medial epicanthoplasty and upper epicanthoplasty
were performed together to remove the fold,
open the lacrimal lake,
and create a natural in-out crease.

The inner corner was covered by an epicanthal fold,
creating a closed-off and stuffy eye shape.

Medial epicanthoplasty and upper epicanthoplasty
opened the previously closed inner corner,
creating a natural yet refreshed eye shape.

Medial epicanthoplasty was performed at another clinic,
but the effect was minimal.
The patient wanted revision to improve
the stuffy-looking eye shape.

A delicate medial epicanthoplasty was planned
according to the eye and facial proportions,
opening the inner corner naturally
without overcorrection.

Medial epicanthoplasty was performed at another clinic,
but the effect was minimal,
so the patient wanted revision surgery.

Revision surgery exposed the lacrimal lake,
and upper epicanthoplasty removed the covering fold.
The horizontal eye length increased,
creating a clearer eye shape.

The patient had previously undergone medial epicanthoplasty,
but the epicanthal fold was not removed,
so revision was desired.

The hook-like epicanthal fold was removed
while preserving natural lacrimal lake exposure.

The patient was dissatisfied after medial epicanthoplasty
and reconstruction at another clinic.
The inner corner looked round and closed,
and the scar had not improved.

Medial epicanthoplasty revision improved the scar
and reshaped the round, closed inner corner
into a more defined and natural form.

Medial epicanthoplasty had been performed,
but the effect was minimal.
The inner corner pointed downward,
creating a stuffy look.

Medial epicanthoplasty revision and upper epicanthoplasty
opened the inner corner and changed the crease start
into a natural semi-out line.

The inner corner pointed downward,
making the eyes look stuffy.

Medial epicanthoplasty expanded the eye shape
and created a clearer, more refreshed look.

The patient had medial epicanthoplasty previously,
but was not satisfied with the inner-corner shape
and wanted correction.

Fine medial epicanthoplasty and upper epicanthoplasty
corrected the inner-corner shape
while avoiding excessive lacrimal lake exposure.

Medial epicanthoplasty was performed previously,
but the lacrimal lake was not exposed,
leaving the eyes looking stuffy.

Medial epicanthoplasty and upper epicanthoplasty
were combined so the double-eyelid line
connected more naturally after correction.

The starting point of the double-eyelid line
was covered by an epicanthal fold,
creating an unnatural appearance.

Upper epicanthoplasty corrected the unnatural
upper inner-corner crease
into a smooth parabolic line.

The 45-degree inner-corner area was covered
by an epicanthal fold,
so the double-eyelid line was not visible.

By lifting the inner-corner fold,
the eye shape changed into a rounded crescent form
and the impression became softer.

The eyelid from the inner corner to the pupil
formed a straight line,
covering the inner pupil area
and creating a fierce impression.

Removing the 45-degree epicanthal fold
at the inner corner
softened the overall impression.

The hook-shaped inner corner
made the eyes look fierce,
so the patient wanted improvement.

Upper epicanthoplasty improved the hook shape
and exposed more of the pupil,
softening the fierce eye shape.

While planning double-eyelid revision,
the patient wanted a semi-out crease.

Because the inner-corner fold covered the crease start,
double-eyelid revision alone was not enough.
Upper epicanthoplasty was added
to create a clear semi-out line.

The patient wanted to improve
a thin, low double-eyelid crease.

Upper epicanthoplasty and natural-adhesion double eyelid surgery
changed the low, thin in-line crease
into a natural in-out line.

The patient had a history of ptosis correction,
but the crease had loosened
and an in-out double-eyelid line was desired.

Double-eyelid revision and upper epicanthoplasty
were performed together,
creating an in-out line visible from the inner corner.

The inner portion of the double-eyelid line was covered,
and the patient wanted partial improvement
and a softer eye shape.

Upper epicanthoplasty revealed the covered line
and changed it into a natural in-out crease.

The patient had lateral canthoplasty previously,
and over-canthoplasty occurred.
Lateral canthoplasty reconstruction was also performed later.

Because the outer corner had become too short,
lateral canthoplasty revision opened it again
for a clearer eye shape.

Lateral canthoplasty was performed previously,
but the effect was minimal.

Lateral canthoplasty revision extended
the horizontal eye length
and created a clearer eye shape.

Lateral canthoplasty was performed previously,
but the patient did not see enough effect.

Through lateral canthoplasty revision,
the horizontal eye length became noticeably longer.

The eyes were round and cute,
but the horizontal length was short
compared with the vertical height.
The patient wanted maximum opening after re-adhesion.

The re-adhered outer corner was opened again,
extending the horizontal eye length.
This improved the balance between
the horizontal and vertical proportions.

Lateral canthoplasty and lower eyelid surgery
were performed previously,
but the patient did not see much improvement.

Lateral canthoplasty and lower eyelid surgery revision
were performed together,
making the overall eye shape larger.

The outer corners were closed off and turned upward,
creating a fierce impression,
so the patient wanted improvement.

The outer eye area was opened to increase eye size,
and lower eyelid surgery lowered the upturned shape
for a softer impression.

The patient wanted to improve
a fierce and intense-looking impression.

The 45-degree lower-eye direction was lowered,
improving the fierce impression.

The patient previously had lateral and lower eyelid surgery,
but the effect was minimal
and revision was desired.

The outer eye space was opened as much as possible
and the outer corner was lowered,
creating a softer impression.