Although medial epicanthoplasty had been performed, the epicanthal fold at the inner corner remained, leaving the eyes looking constricted.

Medial epicanthoplasty revision released the inner-corner epicanthal fold, opening the previously constricted inner eye area and improving the overall appearance.

Medial epicanthoplasty at another clinic three years earlier had been overly opened, followed by medial epicanthoplasty reconstruction one year ago. The inner eye area remained covered and constricted by an epicanthal fold; improvement of this closed-looking contour was requested.

Medial epicanthoplasty revision released the inner-corner fold while allowing appropriate lacrimal-lake exposure for a more open eye contour. The previously awkward out-fold double-eyelid line was also refined naturally.

The inner corner was covered by an epicanthal fold, obscuring the double-eyelid line, with no lacrimal-lake exposure and a constricted appearance.

Medial and upper epicanthoplasty were performed together to release the epicanthal fold and open the lacrimal lake, creating a natural in-out double-eyelid line.

The inner eye area was covered by an epicanthal fold, giving the eyes a constricted appearance.

Medial and upper epicanthoplasty opened the previously constricted inner eye area, resulting in a natural, more open eye contour.

Medial epicanthoplasty at another clinic four years earlier had produced limited effect, and revision was requested to improve the constricted-looking eyes.

Considering eye shape and facial proportions, a subtle medial epicanthoplasty created a natural opening without overcorrection, resulting in a more open eye contour.

Previous medial epicanthoplasty at another clinic had limited effect, so revision was requested.

Medial epicanthoplasty revision exposed the lacrimal lake appropriately, while upper epicanthoplasty released the overlying epicanthal fold. The visible horizontal eye length increased, resulting in a more open eye contour.

The patient had previously undergone medial epicanthoplasty, but the epicanthal fold remained, so revision was requested.

The hooked epicanthal fold was released while preserving the existing degree of lacrimal lake exposure.

Dissatisfied with medial epicanthoplasty performed elsewhere eight years earlier, reconstruction was performed, but the inner corner became rounded and closed-looking, with scarring still unresolved.

Medial epicanthoplasty revision improved the inner-corner scar and refined the rounded, closed inner corner into a defined contour, creating a natural eye appearance.

Prior medial epicanthoplasty had limited effect, and the downward-pointing inner corner made the eyes look narrow.

Medial epicanthoplasty revision and upper epicanthoplasty were performed together, opening the inner corner and refining the double-eyelid starting point into a natural semi-out line.

The downward-pointing inner corner made the eyes look narrow.

Medial epicanthoplasty expanded the eye contour, creating a more open appearance.

Although medial epicanthoplasty was performed two years earlier, the inner-corner shape was unsatisfactory and correction was requested.

To avoid excessive lacrimal-lake exposure, subtle medial and upper epicanthoplasty refined the inner-corner contour.

Although medial epicanthoplasty was performed three years earlier, the lacrimal lake was not exposed at all, leaving the eyes looking constricted.

Medial and upper epicanthoplasty were combined so that after opening the inner corner, the double-eyelid line would connect more naturally.

The double-eyelid starting point was covered by an epicanthal fold, creating an unnatural contour.

Upper epicanthoplasty improved the unnatural upper-lid line at the inner corner into a natural parabolic contour, resulting in a more natural appearance.

The 45-degree inner-corner area was covered by an epicanthal fold, so the double-eyelid line was not visible.

Releasing the inner-corner epicanthal fold created a rounded, parabolic crescent eye shape and a softer overall impression.

The eyelid contour was nearly straight from the inner corner to the center of the iris. The inner corner partly covered the iris, creating a sharp appearance.

Removal of the 45-degree inner-corner epicanthal fold improved the contour to a softer appearance.

The hook-like shape at the inner corner made the eyes appear harsh, and improvement was requested.

Upper epicanthoplasty improved the hook-like inner-corner shape, exposing more of the iris and softening the harsh-looking eye contour.

While planning double-eyelid revision surgery, a semi-out double-eyelid line was desired.

An epicanthal fold covered the 45-degree inner-corner area. Because eyelid revision alone could not readily change the crease, upper epicanthoplasty was added to create a defined semi-out crease.

Improvement of a thin, low double-eyelid line was desired.

Upper epicanthoplasty and natural-adhesion buried-suture double-eyelid surgery raised the low, subtle in-fold crease to create a natural-looking in-out crease.

Although ptosis correction had been performed previously, the line had loosened, and an in-out double-eyelid line was desired.

Revision double-eyelid surgery and upper epicanthoplasty created a line that was visible from the inner corner in a natural in-out contour.

The inner double-eyelid line was covered and improvement was desired, along with a softer eye contour.

Upper epicanthoplasty revealed the covered double-eyelid line, creating a natural in-out line.

Lateral canthoplasty twelve years earlier had over-opened the outer corner, followed by lateral canthoplasty reconstruction four years ago.

The outer eye area had become too short, so another lateral canthoplasty revision was performed to restore a more open contour.

Lateral canthoplasty three years earlier had produced limited effect.

Revision lateral canthoplasty increased the horizontal eye opening, creating a more open-looking contour.

Lateral canthoplasty one year earlier had not produced the desired effect.

After lateral canthoplasty revision, the eyes became visibly longer horizontally.

The eyes had a round, soft appearance, but compared with their vertical dimension, the horizontal length was short, creating a constricted impression. Although lateral canthoplasty was performed one year earlier, it re-adhered and further opening was desired.

Lateral canthoplasty revision released the improperly adhered outer corner and re-expanded it to increase horizontal eye length. As a result, the horizontal-to-vertical eye proportion was improved to a more balanced appearance.

Lateral and lower canthoplasty were performed one year earlier, but the effect was limited.

Lateral and lower canthoplasty revision was performed, creating an overall larger, more open eye contour.

The outer corner was constricted and closed, with an upward tilt that gave a harsh impression; improvement was requested.

The outer eye area was expanded, increasing visible eye size, and lower canthoplasty lowered the upturned contour for a softer appearance.

Improvement of a harsh, intense-looking impression was requested.

Lowering the outer portion of the lower lid at a 45-degree angle softened the sharp appearance.

The patient wanted revision because previous lateral and lower canthoplasty had produced limited improvement.

The outer eye opening was widened within the available anatomical limits, and the outer corner was lowered for a gentler appearance.